I could n't help doing the experiment - the landscape called out to me and I had no choice but to respond. The happen stance went unnoticed by most and yet, I hear associates refer to it as they introduce me to people. What was a rather bad experiment in my opinion others were impressed by it ...I must ask them why?
The landscape intervention at The Gap on Annagh Mountain was designed to raise a question mark on the landscape, a question around land use, transitional space and a community without a central village.
What it raised for me was a question mark about performance art in non theatrical spaces, dramatic statements and being attached to preconceived ideas before venturing out onto a geographical space to work with a community.
It taught me what I already knew. It reinforced my knowledge that to work with and in communities of place to get the level of engagement the artist wants, to get the depth I want - I need to build trust. That level of engagement and participation I want with communities worked really well in the 'a stitch in time' commission. That was an urban project with a central building location. In a rural setting the project framework for engagement needs to be established differently a slow process of getting to know people - talk to them, relate, communicate and then go about building an engaged project. Otherwise community work becomes an artist led statement. That's okay too it has its place. But is that how I want to work?
What 2011 taught me more then anything was that my creativity has a voice people respond too. The response does not always have to be positive...
The questions I ask now as we move into January 2012 are
- which hill will I choose to climb?
- who will accompany me?
- what space shall we be creating?
- why do we want the dialogue?
- when shall we start?
- how will we share our learning?
No comments:
Post a Comment